Skip to content

Discussion 7

Prompt #1

Defining "Medical Gaslighting" in a Carceral Context: * Discussion Point: We should define medical gaslighting not just as a doctor dismissing pain, but as a power dynamic. In prison, the patient has zero autonomy. When a doctor ignores a prisoner, it isn't just poor bedside manner; it is the State telling that woman her body does not matter. * Nuance: Connect this to Angela Davis’s point about racism and misogyny. Is the gaslighting worse for women of color? It likely stems from the historical stereotype that Black women have a "higher pain tolerance," which leads to the denial of medication and treatment.

The "Violence" Aspect: * Discussion Point: The prompt asks how this is "gendered violence." We often think of violence as physical assault. However, denying reproductive care (e.g., ignoring labor pains, denying menstrual products, or Shachie’s specific examples from the film) attacks the specific biology of women. It is a form of violence that attacks their identity and physical safety. * Nuance to Add: The "slow violence" of neglect. It’s not a baton strike; it’s a tumor ignored for three years. Is "bureaucratic negligence" the same as violence? (Argue that yes, in a total institution where you cannot seek outside help, negligence is active violence).

Long-term Impacts (Post-Release): * Discussion Point: The trauma doesn't end at release. If the medical system was a tool of punishment inside, these women are likely to avoid doctors outside. This leads to higher mortality rates in the "free world" because they associate healthcare with punishment and gaslighting. * Pivot/Counter-Point (If someone argues it’s just underfunding, not malice): "That’s a fair point that prisons are underfunded, but does the intent matter if the outcome is the same? Even if the doctor is just 'overworked,' the system is designed so that the first thing cut is women's health. That prioritization is itself an act of gendered violence."

Prompt #2

The "Double-Edged Sword" (Paradox): * Discussion Point: Elster et al. describe care work as "radical," but also note that the system "depends" on it. This creates a paradox. By taking care of each other, women act as human beings resisting a dehumanizing system. However, by doing so, they effectively subsidize the prison. The prison doesn't have to hire more nurses because the inmates are nursing each other. * Nuance: This is unpaid labor. It echoes the history of women being expected to provide free domestic and emotional labor. In prison, this expectation is weaponized.

"Free World" Parallels: * Discussion Point: The prompt asks for "free world" connections. Look at how the US healthcare system relies on family members (usually women) to be unpaid caretakers for the elderly or disabled because professional care is too expensive. * Interesting Angle: Is the "free world" actually free if the same economic pressures force women into the same roles they play in prison? The prison is just a microcosm of how society treats care work—it demands it but refuses to pay for it.

Problem or Opportunity? * Discussion Point: Is this an opportunity for health justice? Yes, in the sense that it proves communities don't need the "state" to keep them safe—they can keep each other safe (an abolitionist argument). It proves that "safety" comes from relationships, not guards. * Pivot/Counter-Point (If someone argues the system just needs reform): "I see where you're coming from regarding reform, but if the system relies on these gaps to function, can it actually be reformed? If we fixed the medical system in prison, would that destroy the beautiful community bonds the women formed? Or is it better to have a cold, efficient system than a warm, neglected one?"

Prompt #3

If your group needs to develop a prompt, here are two options that bridge the gap between the texts:

Option A (Focus on Trust): "Both texts discuss the breakage of trust—medical staff breaking the trust of patients (Prompt 1) and prisoners having to trust each other for survival (Prompt 2). How does the prison environment completely invert who is 'trustworthy'? What does it say about our society when 'criminals' are more reliable caregivers than licensed medical professionals?"

Option B (Focus on Voice): "Angela Davis mentions the 'destructive combination of racism and misogyny.' How does the suppression of voice play into this? In the film and readings, we see women speaking out (testimonies), yet being ignored (gaslighting). How is the act of 'speaking back to the text' or sharing these stories a direct counter to the medical gaslighting described by Elster?"

General Tips for the Conversation:

  • Reference Specifics: When you speak, try to say, "Going back to what Howard and Dixon said..." or "This reminds me of Shachie's scene in the film where..." This helps the notetaker get the attributions right.
  • Ask Follow-ups: If someone gives a short answer, ask, "Do you think that applies to women outside of prison too?" or "How do you think race complicates that point?"